Ray Malone's Commentary

Have you ever wondered why all the militant Muslim sleeper cells in the USA are sleeping? We know they are here. Some we know about and keep our eyes on, but that is about the most we can do. In the USA a person can't be convicted of a crime until they have committed the crime. So before we can do much of anything to control those Muslims that have become citizens, they will have to commit a crime. They will likely sacrifice their own lives in their attack on us.. So in effect we can do nothing but suffer the consequences of their attacks ... when those attacks begin. And of course we don't want to spy on them ... it is better that we die than they lose the right to kill us.

The big question is if they hate our nation and people so much, why haven't they attacked us again before now?

The answer to that should be obvious. They have to get our military out of the middle east and Bush out of the White House before they can attack us here! Why? If we have troops, planes, bombs and have not withdrawn with our tails between our our legs we would undoubtedly respond with a huge amount of force. Certainly George W. Bush would.. and they do not relish the thought of his response.

They would much prefer the response of President Hillary.

Think a moment. If today 10 elementary schools were attacked killing 4 thousand children and it was combined with a demand that we get out of Iraq and Afghanistan. What do you think President Bush would do? I would say a very significant number of Muslims in places like Sadr City would be bombed into oblivion... with most Americans cheering our troops on.

But what if we have withdrawn and our new president has literally apologized for treating our militant friends so badly. What if we have adopted the Democratic position that we had no right to take out Saddam? What if our new president believes we are totally at fault for not understanding how their religion and culture is different from ours? What if our government accepts that we failed to realize that they are not ready for Democracy? Can you say... they are only guilty of paying us back?

What happens when the next president has brought the troops home? What is the response after they attack us. Is it, "I have made a terrible mistake by choosing to fight them here rather than over there? We need to go back and fight them over there!"

I doubt that President Hillary would admit that or even think it. She would talk big but try to sweep the attack under the rug.

What would happen when another attack took place on a number of nursing homes and malls. This time accompanied with demands that we finance the "recovery" of the Muslim world so destroyed by our terrible and illegal attacks.

What do we do about the 65 dollar a gallon gasoline? Ask why congress critters voted that it was more important that the caribou in Alaska have a good sex life than you have a job?

I am not really worried about attacks on us as long as Bush is President. He will be guided by his own judgment. He will not suck up to the idiots in the media. But once there is a new president, such as president Hillary, it may be a lot safer to go somewhere else to live. ... Say Mexico....

It could get bad enough that all the Mexicans choose to go home and we have to beg them to take us with them.

Republicans are often surprised to find that Democratic leaders say and do things that they think will help them win elections. Republicans are surprised and amazed when Democrats for example claim that Iraq is not part of the war on terror. And what the US needs to do is withdraw immediately. They can't understand how the Democratic leadership could believe that surrender is victory. Guess what gang... They Don't!

Republicans are amazed when a leading Democrat such as congressman Murtha calls for a redeployment of our troops to a location further away from Iraq than the USA. He did not say bring them back to the USA he said redeploy them to an Asian island so they could return to Iraq if they were actually needed.

There are two reasons for such stupid proposals. First Democratic leadership thinks the majority of voters are stupid, so they say things they think will appeal to less than bright people.

Democrats say things like Iraqis are not ready to govern themselves. :Let me see.. Wasn't it Democrats in the late 1850s and 1860s that said that illiterate black slaves were not ready to govern themselves ... that they needed to remain slaves? And is it not Democrats that made the point that literate Iraqis are not ready to govern themselves they need to be controlled by a strong dictator. They would deny that is what they think should happen in Iraq... but if people are not "ready to govern themselves" then someone else must govern them. And a person who runs a government with out the consent of the governed is a dictator... is he not?

Someone once said Democratic leaders are all for equality.. but that they believe Democratic leaders are always more equal than anyone else.

My point is Democratic leadership sees themselves as brilliant and as the only ones with the knowledge and skills required to produce the good life for the underlings of society. They are, they believe, .... a superior breed.

Thus they have to tell the masses what they think the masses want to hear. It is not necessary to tell the voters the truth or even what the Democrats will do if elected. They believe the voters would not understand anyway. It is only necessary to tell voters what it takes to get them to vote for the Democratic Candidates.. It is only important for Democratic candidates to say those things that will acquire political power and hold on to it.

Thus a Bill Clinton can tell the voters that the era of big government is over. It is not what he and Hillary want to do or intend to do, or believe. It was saying what it takes to get the support of the underlings... who don't know what is good for them anyway. That is why they have to keep telling us how intelligent Hillary is. But you will notice they never tell us her I.Q.

So opposing George W. Bush has nothing to do with the merits or lack of merits of his policies. It has to do with acquiring power. And Democrats must have power because they are the ruling class..

From the Democratic standpoint Republicans are stupid. Republicans believe that people should control their own lives and that the average person is quite bright and fully capable of deciding his or her own future. Democratic leaders know that belief is just plain stupid..

Republicans believe individuals should have as much freedom as possible. But Democrats are certain that ordinary people are not able or even capable of taking care of themselves. They have to be motivated and controlled by those with the intelligence to do so.. That means the Democrats should always be in power.

The People need government to take care of them and to cause them to do what is required of them. So for the Democratic leadership to say things they know are not true in order to motivate and control people... is just part of being the rightful ruling class.

Actually Democrats are willing to sort of share the role of ruling class. Well at least let a sub class of people have major influence. That group is the media. Members of the media are big government fans. They chose as a career the job of reporting on government. It is just as logical for a government reporter to be a government fan as it is for a sports reporter to be a sports fan. In fact is is easier to find a sports reporter that is not a sports fan than it is to find a government reporter who is not a government fan. So for the media Democrats are their rightful rulers and they are their biggest fans.

So do Democratic leaders have principles and beliefs on what government should be? Of course they do... But they know better than to tell the voters what they do believe.

That is why Democrats and the media are so surprised when Republicans do what they say they will do. When Reagan became president the media and the Democrats were absolutely shocked. They could not believe Reagan, who after all was a former Democrat, did what he said he was going to do. To Democratic office holders doing what one said he would do was just unheard of.. The media was amazed. After all anyone who believes that people are smart enough to govern themselves has to be stupid.

Today Democrats see George W. Bush as stupid. To them he has to be.

After all President Bush says what he means and means what he says.

No Democrat with a brain would ever do that.